single mom with no partner and a challenged child is the lowest of the low in the congregation pecking order.
Lets be fair to the argument and not get personal...
This whole thread evolved into an argument because Reniaa discounted the testimony of this Assembly Overseer without ever hearing it. Instead she speculated about his personal agenda without any evidence or knowing anything about him.
My comment was simply an attempt to speculate about what her motivations might be to behave in such a manner that is clearly mind-boggling and frustrating to many posters here. Since she questioned the assembly overseers motivation in speaking out, it is only right that her motivations also be questioned. Or do you hold some posters to a different standard of argument than others?
My post was not a personal attack on Reniaa as I do not look down in the least on single mothers, df'd or not, or those with sick or disabled family members. I was often friends with those ones when I was a JW as I couldn't stand the self righteous, elderette types. It is an often repeated lament of those ones, in the congregation and on this forum, that they, in fact, did feel as if they were ignored in the congregation and on the bottom of the unofficial, (but oh, so obvious), JW social heirarchy. If I had a dime for every time I heard single mothers complain about how left out they were socially, I'd be out shopping right now!
I cannot be "fair to the argument" with Reniaa because there is rarely any rule of logic to her arguments. Instead, we are treated over and over again to the same straw man, black or white, and circular reasoning parroted directly from Watchtower literature. She totally ignores valid points made by other posters and simply moves from thread to thread spouting the same nonsense.
I stand by my speculations about why Reniaa posts here, as un-PC as they may be. Are they to be taken seriously as logical and fair argumentation? Absolutely not, but then I haven't seen any of that on this thread or in Reniaa's posts. That's really not what we're doing here is it?